Pianist Krystian Zimmerman stopped in the middle of a
performance in Essen, Germany, when he spotted a member of the audience filming
him using a mobile phone. When he later returned to the stage, he told the
audience that the posting of performances on Youtube is destroying music, that
it is robbing musicians of recording projects and contracts, because something
“has already been on Youtube.”
Ever since the advent of tape recorders, video cameras, and
now mobile phones with high quality recording ability, musicians have had to
contend with their performances being recorded without their permission and
knowledge. In concert programmes, there is inevitably the statement telling
members of the audience that recording and photography of the performance is
strictly forbidden. Today, smart phones are so small that anybody can easily
record a live performance without anyone being any the wiser.
But to record a live performance without permission is
simply intellectual theft.
With the advent of the Internet, we have indeed opened a
Pandora’s box when it comes to the invasion of privacy as well as the violation
of intellectual property. Today, Youtube and Facebook have made the computer a
part of everyday life, rather than a tool for research. On Youtube, we find
anything from movie trailers to full-length movies, from cooking demonstrations
to instructions on how to fix a leaking sink, from parents of little children
taping them playing their first pieces on the piano (the rationale of anyone
posting anything of one’s own children in such a public forum is beyond my
understanding) to concerts, interviews with and documentaries on great artists.
I have been as guilty as anyone in watching musical
performances on Youtube, performances that I would otherwise not have had an
opportunity to enjoy. To be able to, with the click of a mouse, access great
performances by Karajan, Bernstein, Rubinstein, Horowitz, Gould, Klemperer,
Walter, just to name a few, is indeed difficult to resist.
As a musician, I am very much aware of respecting
intellectual property. On principle, I buy original CD’s and DVD’s, and I buy
scores of pieces I want to play, instead of photocopying them from a borrowed
copy. However, Mr. Zimmerman’s recent outburst has reminded me that watching
posted videos on Youtube can be, in a way, robbing artists and musicians of
their livelihood. A lot of materials posted on Youtube are meant for free
public consumption, but a lot of it is not.
To post a musician’s newest CD on Youtube is, essentially,
robbing what the artist should rightfully be earning.
We have lived with the Internet being part of our lives for
more than a couple of decades now. However, I am sure that laws governing what
can or cannot be posted on the web still leave a lot of grey areas. Musicians
should not have to be in a position to have to police the audience for
inappropriate behavior.
Artists, computer experts, and lawmakers need to have a
serious dialogue in coming up with ways to regulate the availability of
materials on the Internet. With the sophistication of computers and the large
number of people who are computer-savvy, this might seem like an insurmountable
task.
But we should and must begin the process of trying to
protect those who bring beauty and enjoyment to us, and not to exploit the
fruits of their labour.
